<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10% at 75%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usablemarkets.com/2010/02/03/10-at-75/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usablemarkets.com/2010/02/03/10-at-75/</link>
	<description>markets, design, usability, research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.usablemarkets.com/2010/02/03/10-at-75/comment-page-1/#comment-76480</link>
		<dc:creator>David Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usablemarkets.com/?p=1648#comment-76480</guid>
		<description>Thought experiment:  If you hadn&#039;t read that item, but someone asked you to guess how many houses are worth 75% or less of mortgage balance, what would you have guessed?

I would have guessed 15-20%.  So 10% is actually better than expected!

You can see how useful this quality of being pleasantly surprised is in some prosfessions, like Wall Street analysis.

At one time I sold real estate in inner city areas, some of the toughest neighborhoods.  A lot of sales were with very high LTV, up to 100%.  Lots of mortgages were interest only, so not amortizing principal, or one of those weird COFI loans which gave the option of not amortizing principal.  I&#039;d have to guess a lot more than 10% of those owners are underwater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought experiment:  If you hadn&#8217;t read that item, but someone asked you to guess how many houses are worth 75% or less of mortgage balance, what would you have guessed?</p>
<p>I would have guessed 15-20%.  So 10% is actually better than expected!</p>
<p>You can see how useful this quality of being pleasantly surprised is in some prosfessions, like Wall Street analysis.</p>
<p>At one time I sold real estate in inner city areas, some of the toughest neighborhoods.  A lot of sales were with very high LTV, up to 100%.  Lots of mortgages were interest only, so not amortizing principal, or one of those weird COFI loans which gave the option of not amortizing principal.  I&#8217;d have to guess a lot more than 10% of those owners are underwater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex kirtland</title>
		<link>http://www.usablemarkets.com/2010/02/03/10-at-75/comment-page-1/#comment-76352</link>
		<dc:creator>alex kirtland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usablemarkets.com/?p=1648#comment-76352</guid>
		<description>Yes, Lou, that&#039;s right.  75% of the value of the mortgage.

~alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Lou, that&#8217;s right.  75% of the value of the mortgage.</p>
<p>~alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou</title>
		<link>http://www.usablemarkets.com/2010/02/03/10-at-75/comment-page-1/#comment-76349</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usablemarkets.com/?p=1648#comment-76349</guid>
		<description>Just to be clear, looks like they&#039;re talking about mortgage value, not purchase price.  Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be clear, looks like they&#8217;re talking about mortgage value, not purchase price.  Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
